Peer review is a strategy used to make sure that only high-quality research articles are published. In order to maintain a high-quality publication, Bundelkhand Research Journal rigorously reviews each contribution. All submissions are first reviewed for completeness before being sent to be evaluated by an editor, who will then decide if they meet the criteria for peer review. The chief editor and editors will take the peer-reviewed reports into consideration when making a choice, but they are not obligated by the recommendations or opinions provided in them. The double-blind peer review process, which can take up to four months from the date of submission, is used to evaluate each manuscript that is submitted. This normally entails at least two independent, expert peer reviewers. Reviewers have a responsibility to assess the integrity, significance, and originality of the work. To ensure a fair assessment, parts of the text that could identify the authors or their origins-such as the acknowledgement and the paragraph on ethical clearance-were omitted. Manuscripts that are recommended for publication by peer reviewers are processed further. Manuscripts that are rejected at this stage are either not sufficiently original, have significant scientific faults, have poor grammar or poor English, or fall beyond the journal's objectives and scope. Those who fulfil the basic requirements are typically sent to at least two professional referees for review.

Publisher: Maharaja Chhatrasal Bundelkhand University, Police Lines Road, Panna Road Chhatarpur (M.P.) 471001